recombinant human ereg (PeproTech)
Structured Review

Recombinant Human Ereg, supplied by PeproTech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/recombinant human ereg/product/PeproTech
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Low-affinity ligands of the epidermal growth factor receptor are long-range signal transmitters in collective cell migration of epithelial cells"
Article Title: Low-affinity ligands of the epidermal growth factor receptor are long-range signal transmitters in collective cell migration of epithelial cells
Journal: Cell reports
doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2024.114986
Figure Legend Snippet: (A) Schematic of EGFRL-ScNeo expressed at the cell membrane. (B) Structure of EGFRL-ScNeos. SP, signal peptide; Pro, propeptide; Sc, mScarlet; EGF, EGF domain; TM, transmembrane domain; Neo, mNeonGreen; VV, two valine residues; Ig, immunoglobulin-like domain. (C) xy confocal images of EGFRL-ScNeos. Scale bar, 10 μm. (D) mScarlet/mNeonGreen fluorescence ratio of the cell membrane. The bar graphs show the mean values. Each dot represents the average value for one experiment ( n > 100 cells/experiment). (E) Western blot analysis of total cell lysates of EGFRL-ScNeo-expressing cells. *Full-length EGFRL-ScNeo; **cytoplasmic domain with mNeonGreen. (F) The proportion of cleaved EGFRL-ScNeo in (E). The bar graphs show the mean values. Each dot indicates an independent experiment. (G) Western blot analysis of supernatants of EGFRL-ScNeo-expressing cells. (H) The production rates of EGFRL from a single EGFRL-ScNeo-expressing cell. The bar graphs show the mean values. Each dot indicates an independent experiment. (I) mScarlet/mNeonGreen ratio images of EREG-ScNeo-expressing MDCK cells upon treatment with 10 nM TPA or 10 μM marimastat . Scale bar, 20 μm. (J) ERK activity of MDCK-4KO cells expressing EKARrEV-NLS stimulated with the supernatant of MDCK-4KO cells expressing HBEGF-ScNeo. Scale bar, 50 μm. (K) Time course of ERK activity in MDCK-4KO-EKARrEV-NLS cells stimulated with supernatant from MDCK-4KO cells expressing EGFRL-ScNeo. Solid lines represent the means from two independent experiments ( n > 1,000 cells/experiment). (L) Maximum ERK activity from the time course shown in (K). The bar graphs show the mean values from three independent experiments. Each dot represents the average value for one experiment ( n > 1,000 cells/experiment). See also and .
Techniques Used: Membrane, Fluorescence, Western Blot, Expressing, Activity Assay
Figure Legend Snippet: (A) Schematic of the SLIPT system. (B) Time course of normalized FRET/CFP ratio for TSen stimulated with various m D cTMP concentrations. Values were normalized to the average pre-stimulation baseline (20 min). Solid lines and shaded areas represent means and SDs from three independent experiments ( n > 100 cells/experiment). (C) miRFP703 and mScarlet/mNeonGreen ratio images of cells expressing AREG-ScNeo and eDHFR-cRaf. Images are snapshots of . Scale bar, 20 μm. (D) Schematic of SLIPT-induced EGFRL shedding and ERK activity observation. (E) Representative time-lapse ERK activity images. The white area at the center of the 0 min image indicates the EREG-producer cells. Scale bar, 100 μm. (F) Representative time-lapse ERK activity images. Each ligand producer is located at the center of the image. Images are snapshots of . Scale bar, 100 μm. (G) The time of maximum ERK activity in receiver cells in (F) after m D cTMP addition is plotted against the distance from the center. Each dot indicates a single cell. (H) Velocities of ERK waves propagated from each EGFRL producer. Each dot indicates a single producer-cell population. The red bars represent the means from three independent experiments, depicted by the three colors ( n = 28 [EREG], 36 [AREG], 50 [TGF-α], 30 [HBEGF], and 23 [NRG1] producer-cell populations). p values were calculated by a two-sample unpaired t test. (I) Maximum radius of ERK waves propagated from each EGFRL producer. Data in (H) were used for the analysis. The red bars represent the means. p values were calculated by a two-sample unpaired t test. (J) Western blot analysis of the supernatant of each producer cell incubated with or without 10 μM m D cTMP. (K) The production rates of EGFRL from each producer cell in (J). The mScarlet intensities of HBEGF supernatant with m D cTMP were set as 1. See also and and and .
Techniques Used: Expressing, Activity Assay, Western Blot, Incubation
Figure Legend Snippet: (A) (Top) Schematic of TGF-α-EREG chimera. (Bottom) mNeonGreen xz images of EREG, TGF-α, and a TGF-α-EREG chimera. Scale bars, 10 μm. (B) The velocity of the ERK wave propagated from each producer. Each dot indicates a single producer-cell population. The red bars represent the means from two independent experiments, depicted by the two colors ( n = 30 [EREG], 26 [TGF-α], and 24 [TGF-α-EREG chimera] producer-cell populations). p values were calculated by a two-sample unpaired t test. (C) The velocity of the ERK wave propagated from each producer cell to WT or EGFR-overexpressing (O/E) receiver cells. Each dot indicates a single producer-cell population. The red bars represent the means from two independent experiments ( n = 35 [EREG, WT], 41 [EREG, EGFR O/E], 32 [HBEGF, WT], and 12 [HBEGF, EGFR O/E] producer-cell populations). p values were calculated by a two-sample unpaired t test. (D) Representative ERK activity images in MDCK-α−1-catenin KO receiver cells. Each EGFRL producer cell is located at the center. Images were acquired 30 min after m D cTMP addition . Scale bar, 100 μm. (E) Maximum radius of the ERK wave propagated from each EREG-producer cell to each receiver cell. Each dot indicates a single producer-cell population. The red bars represent the means from three independent experiments, depicted by the three colors ( n = 38 [WT] and 42 [quinKO] producer-cell populations). p values were calculated by a two-sample unpaired t test. (F) The velocity of the ERK wave propagated from each producer cell to each receiver cell. Each dot indicates a single producer-cell population. The red bars represent the means from two independent experiments ( n = 21 [EREG, WT], 21 [EREG, E-cadherin KO], 24 [EREG, p120-catenin KO], 18 [HBEGF, WT], 11 [HBEGF, E-cadherin KO], and 21 [HBEGF, p120-catenin KO] producer-cell populations). p values were calculated by two-sample unpaired t test. (G) Representative ERK activity images in MDCK-4KO-EKARrEV-NLS receiver cells. Each producer cell expressing eDHFR-cRaf is located in the white area. Images were acquired 20 min after m D cTMP addition. Scale bar, 50 μm. (H) Maximum radius of the ERK wave propagation in (G). Each dot indicates a single producer-cell population. The red bars represent the means. n = 23 (WT) or 25 (TKO) producer-cell populations from three independent experiments. n = 6 (4KO) producer-cell populations from two independent experiments. n = 11 (dEREG) producer-cell populations from a single experiment. p values were calculated by a two-sample unpaired t test. See also and .
Techniques Used: Activity Assay, Expressing
Figure Legend Snippet: (A) Schematic of the boundary assay. (B) Representative ERK activity images in receiver cells adjacent to each producer cell . m D cTMP was added at 0 min. Scale bar, 100 μm. (C) Receiver-cell displacement adjacent to each producer cell. The red lines show the mean values. Each dot represents the average of a single field of view. n > 1,000 cells from three independent experiments, depicted by the three colors. p values were calculated by a two-sample unpaired t test. (D) Representative FRET/CFP images of receiver cells expressing ERK, tyrosine kinases, or ROCK biosensors. White arrowheads indicate the location of EGFRL-producer cells. Images were acquired 32 min after m D cTMP addition . Scale bar, 100 μm. (E) ERK activity in 10 representative cells around EREG or HBEGF producers was plotted over time after m D cTMP addition. (F) FWHM of ERK activation in receiver cells. Each dot indicates a single receiver cell. n = 50 cells from a single experiment. See also and .
Techniques Used: Activity Assay, Expressing, Activation Assay
Figure Legend Snippet: (A) Schematic of the experiment. (B) MDCK-4KO receiver cells surrounding EREG-ScNeo or HBEGF-ScNeo producer-cells. Cells were fixed and stained with anti-EEA1 and anti-Rab7 antibodies. White circles and arrowheads indicate mScarlet-positive vesicles co-localized with EEA1 and Rab7, respectively. The gray area indicates the producer cells. Scale bar, 5 μm. (C) Fraction of mScarlet-positive vesicles co-localized with EEA1 or Rab7 from images in (B). The bar graphs show the mean values. Each dot represents the average of a single field of view. n = 2 fields of view from a single experiment. (D) MDCK-Erbock-ErbB1 receiver cells surrounding EREG-ScNeo or HBEGF-ScNeo producer cells. Cells were fixed and stained with anti-EEA1, anti-Rab7, and anti-RFP antibody. Scale bar, 5 μm. (E) The proportion of mScarlet-positive vesicles co-localized with Rab7 or EEA1 from experiments in (D). The bar graphs show the mean values. Each dot represents the average of a single field of view. n = 11 (EREG) or 9 (HBEGF) fields of view from three independent experiments.
Techniques Used: Staining
Figure Legend Snippet: (A) ERK activity images in migrating MDCK WT, dEREG, or dHBEGF cells. Scale bar, 200 μm. (B) Kymographs of ERK activity generated from time-lapse FRET/CFP ratio images. White arrowheads indicate the first ERK wave propagating from the leader cells. White arrows indicate ERK waves propagating from the leader cells 10 h after removing the confinement. (C) Length of ERK waves propagating from the leader cells 10 h after removing the confinement. Each dot indicates a single ERK wave. Each color represents data from a single experiment. The red bars represent the means. p value was calculated by a two-sample unpaired t test. (D) Representative images of single-cell trajectories 10 to 22 h after removing the confinement. Scale bar, 200 μm. (E) Displacement of MDCK cells at 10 to 22 h after removing the confinement. Each dot represents a single cell. n > 1,000 cells for each experiment. (F) Schematic of an in vivo imaging of ERK activity during wound healing of mouse ear skin expressing hyBRET-ERK-NLS. (G) Representative ERK activity images in WT or Ereg −/− mouse ear skin . White arrows indicate ERK waves propagating from the wound edge (right black arrow). Scale bar, 100 μm. (H) Kymographs of ERK activity generated from time-lapse FRET/CFP ratio images. White and black arrows indicate ERK waves propagating from the wound edge (0 μm). (I) Displacement of mouse skin basal layer cells in 3 h toward the wound edge. Each dot represents a single cell. n > 1,000 cells for each mouse. See also and .
Techniques Used: Activity Assay, Generated, In Vivo Imaging, Expressing
Figure Legend Snippet: KEY RESOURCES TABLE
Techniques Used: Virus, Recombinant, Microscopy, Sequencing, Knock-Out, Plasmid Preparation, Software



